GLOSSARY

Average Response Time

Average Response Time (ART) is the mean time a system takes to return a response to client requests over a period, typically measured end-to-end or at the API/server layer. In e-commerce, reducing ART for search, PDP, cart, and checkout endpoints yields faster pages, higher conversion, better crawl efficiency, and more resilient peaks.

What is Average Response Time?

Average Response Time (ART) is the mean duration between a request and the corresponding response. It can be measured end-to-end (browser → CDN → app → DB → browser) or component-level (e.g., API gateway or application server only).

Formula: ART = (sum of response times for N requests) ÷ N.

Related but different: latency (one-way delay), TTFB (time to first byte), LCP/INP (user-centric Web Vitals), and throughput/QPS (volume). ART complements these, it doesn’t replace them.

How is ART measured?

  • Scope selection: Choose end-to-end (RUM/synthetic) or backend-only (APM) depending on the question.
  • Sampling window: Use rolling windows (e.g., 5-minute, 1-hour) per route/service.
  • Outliers & distribution: Track median (p50), p90/p95 alongside the mean; trim or winsorize outliers for reporting.
  • Segmentation: Split by route (e.g., /search, /product/{id}, /checkout), geo, device, cache hit/miss, auth state.
  • Instrumentation: RUM beacons, synthetic checks, APM tracers, CDN logs, load tests; propagate trace IDs across tiers.

Why it matters for e-commerce & SEO

  • Conversion & UX: Faster responses reduce bounce and abandonment during search, PDP rendering, and checkout.
  • Operational headroom: Lower ART at steady state means more capacity for peak sales (Black Friday) before saturation.
  • Crawl efficiency: Stable, quick server responses help bots fetch more pages per crawl budget and keep indexes fresh.
  • Search quality: Snappier search APIs improve on-site relevance loops (more queries, better interaction signals).

Benchmarks & targets (pragmatic)

  • API routes critical to conversion (search, PDP, cart): p50 ≤100–200 ms, p95 ≤500–800 ms at steady traffic.
  • HTML doc responses (SSR): aim TTFB ≤200–300 ms from the edge; keep ART low and variance tight.

Treat these as starting targets; validate with A/B tests and business KPIs.

How to reduce ART (playbook)

  • Cache aggressively: CDN edge caching for HTML where safe; cache API reads (product, price, inventory) with short TTLs + revalidation.
  • Optimize queries: Add indexes, avoid N+1 queries, pre-compute aggregates, use read replicas.
  • Parallelize I/O: Fan-out backend calls; batch requests; use async/promise pipelines.
  • Trim payloads: Compress (Gzip/Brotli), paginate, send only needed fields; prefer JSON over verbose formats.
  • Warm critical paths: Pre-render templates, warm caches before campaigns; keep connections (HTTP/2, keep-alive) hot.
  • Isolate hot routes: Dedicated pools/limits for /checkout, /search; apply circuit breakers and timeouts.
  • Edge compute: Move simple transformations and personalization to the edge when possible.
  • Observe & guardrail: SLOs with error budgets; alert on p95 regressions, not just averages.

Common pitfalls

  • Reporting only averages (hides long-tail slowness).
  • Mixing end-to-end and backend timings in the same metric.
  • Ignoring cache misses and geo variance.
  • Big payloads/images in HTML responses despite fast API times.
  • “Fixing” ART by over-caching stale content without validation.

Examples (e-commerce)

  • Search API: ART from 250 ms → 120 ms by caching synonyms and pre-ranking popular queries.
  • PDP: ART from 600 ms → 280 ms after denormalizing price + stock, and batching vendor calls.
  • Checkout: p95 from 1.2 s → 600 ms via DB indexing and idempotent, parallel tax/shipping calculations.

Summary

Average Response Time is a foundational reliability and speed metric. Track it alongside percentiles and segment by route, then apply caching, query tuning, parallelism, and payload trimming to shrink ART—unlocking faster pages, stronger conversion, and healthier crawl behavior.

FAQ

Is average or median better?

Use both. Median (p50) reflects typical user experience; p95 shows tail pain. Mean is useful for capacity modeling but should never be your only KPI.

Does ART affect Core Web Vitals?

Indirectly. Faster server/API responses improve TTFB and help the page reach LCP faster; they also reduce UI blocking that harms INP.

How often should I sample?

Continuously. Alert on p95/p99 regression over short windows; review weekly trend lines for capacity and cost decisions.

What tools should I use?

Combine RUM (real users), synthetic monitors (clean baselines), APM/tracing (root cause), and CDN analytics (edge view).